12/25/2023 0 Comments Bugzilla host![]() Let me know if we should consider this as RFE or Bug, so that I can update it. Requirement of activation key should be optional like the hostgroup parameter. In Satellite 6.10, if even if I do not create activation key, the host cannot be registered because registration template explicitly asks for it. # subscription-manager register -org="Default_Organization" -environment="Library"ģ) Attach pool-id to attach subscription: In earlier version till Satellite 6.9, to register hosts below way is possible which do not ask specifically for activation key:ġ) Download katello-ca-consumer rpm and install it: You have an activation key for your hosts with the Satellite Tools 6.9 repository enabled.Īctivation key can be pre-requisite but should not be compulsory. Registering a Host to Red Hat Satellite Using The Bootstrap Script Registering a Host to Red Hat Satellite Manually Īn activation key must be available for the hostģ.4. Registering a Host to Red Hat Satellite Using the Global Registration Template ģ.2. What is the use case for registering a Content Host without an Activation Key?Īre there any documented procedures which do not require an Activation key?Ħ.10 docs are not published yet, but checking 6.9 docs:ģ.1. The intention is that the user creates an Activation Key and then a Host Group containing that Activation Key, so its hard to see how this is a valid bug (I noticed you removed RFE). Should be able to register hosts even if no activation key is created as in earlier Satellite 6 versions. ![]() 'Generate' option should be enabled, if one do not want to use activation key. Unable to register hosts if there is no activation key created or do not want to use activation key. 'Generate' option is grayed out when there is no activation key created or selected. ![]() After creating and selecting 'Activation Key' from the 'Advanced' tab, 'Generate' option gets available. From Satellite WebUI -> Hosts -> Register Content Host page, under "General" tab, 'Generate' option is grayed out.Ģ. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):ġ. That said, the company I work with still uses it (alongwith paid support) to ensure we are keeping track of long-running projects.- In Satellite WebUI -> Hosts -> Register Host page, selecting activation key is compulsory even if there is no activation key created. The most recent version was last deployed in 2016 (yes, 6 years ago), and in this time, if you are not up to date with the most recent and relevant asks, somebody is bound to take over your marketshare. Their limited pace in the development and continuous improvement of the tool has been the reason for it losing it's marketshare. Their reports were pretty good back in the day. Their email alerts are very useful and detailed. While there are many sophisticated tools out there for issue management, a few things that work in it's favor is the community support, free-and-open-source (FOSS) and the ease of deployment. The simplicity of the tool really got me further interested in the Quality career. When I used Bugzilla early on in my career, and I am speaking about 10 years ago, it was my first issue tracking software as a QA Engineer. The interface is very light, deployment is easy and no maintenance is needed unless there's a security upgrade coming. To start a new container (or rerun your last container) you simply do: docker-compose up. And the beauty of FOSS has helped them retain some of their loyal users. Since the rise of Atlassian and JIRA, the market share has completely been wiped away, barring a few customers/companies who still run it. Back then there was no JIRA (or atleast it wasn't as popular as it is now) or ZOHO, and hence the adoption was a no-brainer. ![]() The overall experience with Bugzilla was good.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |